Grunts and strong grunts one another put repetitive aspects. Mainly because repetitive factors differed much more with the a couple grunt versions, we named him or her differently: ‘pulses’ having grunts, and ‘voice cycles’ getting strong grunts. We utilized the program PRAAT 5.4.01 () for the sound analyses.
We chose large-top quality grunts and deep grunts because of the merely and additionally those who work in the research away from voice characteristics, that had a rule-to-noises proportion out-of dos or even more to the around three pulses/sound time periods towards the high amplitude. To achieve this, we opposed new voice pressure of the heartbeat/years into 3rd high amplitude into the sound stress off three randomly chose facts from the history music contained in this 0.5 s up until the grunt or deep grunt. In the event your sound tension of these heart circulation/stage was at minimum twice as higher as the records noise, i analysed the newest qualities of grunt otherwise deep grunt.
Towards studies of characteristics of the grunt models, i thought four details: step one. amount of pulses/schedules each voice, 2. lifetime of the fresh new sound, step three. amount of pulses/time periods for each second, cuatro. principal frequency.To measure exactly how many pulses/cycles for every voice, i designated most of the evident pulse/years throughout the wave-form of any grunt in the zero crossing adopting the higher height throughout the heartbeat/stage and counted the brand new marked no crossings. To find the time of an audio, i mentioned the full time within marked zero crossings of one’s first and last evident pulse/cylcle. To assess what amount of pulses/time periods each 2nd, i separated what number of pulses/schedules by lifetime of the newest voice. To choose the dominant frequency, i examined the three loudest pulses in this an audio to the volume toward highest sound pressure level and you may grabbed the common ones around three frequencies.
Towards the research of voice functions to have clicks and you will plops, i simply used audio whereby we could demonstrably select brand new sound-producing seafood. We discussed ticks and plops using two parameters: 1. Principal regularity, 2. voice pressure difference between all the way down and higher wavelengths.
To search for the dominant frequency of voice, we examined the advantage spectral range of the new click otherwise plop for the latest volume to the high sound strain. We derived the benefit range about no crossing of one’s waveform between your highest and you may lower amplitude. So you can assess new sound pressure change, we substracted the fresh sound stress of your fifth harmonic away from the new voice strain of your prominent volume.
datingranking.net/nl/misstravel-overzicht
Towards the reviews off voice features, i earliest averaged the information and knowledge to own men songs toward personal peak. We had been not able to do that for females, because there try not a chance out-of repeatedly pinpointing individual female within the the brand new films easily.
I opposed the new dominant frequency and you will stage anywhere between men grunts and strong grunts to determine differences between the two telephone call sizes. We then checked-out to own differences between new both form of solitary-heartbeat audio.
For statistical analyses, we first investigated the properties of the tested sounds for normality using Shapiro-Wilk tests. If data were normally distributed according to Shapiro–Wilk test (P > 0.05), we used t-tests to examine the differences in sound properties. If the Shapiro–Wilk test showed a significant deviation from a normal distribution (P < 0.05), we log-transformed the data to achieve normality, or used Mann–Whitney U tests where a normal distribution could not be achieved by data transformation. For the statistical analysis of sounds we used R (Version 3.3.1, We assumed a difference between sound properties to be significant if the P-value of the respective test was < 0.05.
